Evolving Opinions

Questions for a Non-Technical Interview

2011-01-10T19:45:00.000-08:00

You can prepare for technical interviews, since they are... well, technical. But what about non-technical interviews? I don't know how to prepare for those...

About one year ago I had a non-technical phone interview. For some reason, I kept track of the questions that I was asked. Since the event is well in the past, I thought of posting the questions to help those that may be wondering - as I was - what does a non-technical interview may look likes.

These are the questions that I received:

Why did you pick CS as a major?
What is the one project you are proud about and why?
Who is the most inspirational person in your life?
What do you like to do as extracurricular activities?
What is your opinion about being a leader among technical women?
Tell me about some technical obstacles that you encountered and how you overcome them
What are your plans for your career?
What would you do to increase the enrollment of women in CS related fields?
What's your vision about the importance of technical women?
What is an interesting area in technology?
If you have endless monetary and technological possibilities, what project would you work on?
When did you fall in love with CS?

The funny thing about these questions is that I don't really know what they can tell about me...

If you've had a non-technical interview, and you'd like to share sample of the questions you received, please add them in the comments.

Snippets from GHC2010 - Part 2: Five reasons to participate in the PhD Forum

2010-11-30T18:16:00.000-08:00

One of the many ways you can participate in the Grace Hopper Conference is through the PhD Forum. The PhD Forum is intended for PhD students in their last year of the program to share their thesis research.

Why should you participate in this forum when you already have other technical conferences? I participated this year and found it more beneficial than I imagined. I didn't know what to expect because this was my very first GHC. In five bullet points, this is why you should participate in the PhD Forum

The forum is split in several sessions. This year each session had 3 presentations. Each session has a mentor assigned that helps you through the presentation and before and after the event. My mentor was the amazing Patty Lopez from Intel. Patty was extremely useful before, during, and after the presentation, and after the conference was over. I am happy to have found such a mentor!
The audience is from a wide range of technical backgrounds. Unlike most presentations we give during grad school, this time around I was presenting to students from outside my area of expertise, people from industry and even undergrads. I found it challenging and fun to present to such a diverse audience, but, beyond all, it made me think about how to distill my research to its fundamental concepts that can be explained to anyone with some technical computing background.
GHC in general is a very friendly community and place for mentoring and networking. I was very impressed with the questions from the audience, both in technical content and interest in the work. I also presented my research during a poster session, which allowed people that were interested in more details to drop by and chat some more on the subject.
This was the very first time when I received written anonymous feedback on a research presentation. I was overwhelmed with the response: people took the time to write thoughtful comments and provide written feedback on the technical content, the presentation delivery and the appealing factor of my research. I remember one of the comments that made laugh: "cool idea, I can't wait to see it in my next processor!" :)
Several people from industry got interested in my research and asked me whether I am interested in internships. Unfortunately, I'm planning to graduate soon and I couldn't take advantage of such opportunities, but it's important to know that such opportunities exist and GHC is the place to "grab" them. One person in particular made my day when she came after lunch that day to let me know that her academic department is hiring and they could use more computer architects!

If you participated in a PhD Forum at GHC what are your five reasons to encourage others to take advantage of this special opportunity?

Update: Somehow, I forgot one of the most useful aspects of submitting your work to the PhD Forum: when you submit your work, you are required to provide the name of several reviewers that get to read your proposal and give you feedback. When I received my reviews for my PhD Forum proposal, it was such a boost of confidence to see what others thought about my research. Who doesn't need a boost of confidence?! You may think that it requires time to apply for the PhD Forum, but it is time very well invested!

Snippets from GHC2010 - Part 1: Anita Borg

2010-10-04T18:06:00.000-07:00

One early morning (7:30 am to be more precise :D) at GHC2010, I had a special breakfast with Google scholars from all over the world. I felt very fortunate to be part of this crowd. But even more fortunate to listen to Alan Eustace (Google Senior Vice President, Engineering & Research - at the time of this writing) talking about Anita Borg. It turns out Alan and Anita joined DEC's Western Research Laboratory the same day and they were friends for 15 years.

Listening to Alan's memories of Anita Borg confirmed my impression of her. She was a fearless technical woman! I wish I remember all that was said... I'll try to document what I do remember.

Anita Bord did research in systems with publications in the top conferences of the field (ASPLOS, ISCA, SOSP - check out her DBLP entry). It was during one of the SOSP conferences that she managed to get together all women in the conference (a handful), start the Systers mailing list and initiate what years later became Anita Borg Institute. It turns out that the first discussion happened in the ladies room. All women in the conference fit into one. I really think Anita would be really happy and proud to learn that at GHC this year, there were so many women that all men restrooms on several floors of the hotel were thoughtfully transformed in ladies rooms. Hard to believe? See it for yourself!

Anita was a fearless spirit, she loved to dance, she loved to dress up, she didn't only talk about Woodstock, she actually went to Woodstock, and when she had an idea, it took only weeks to start making it happen. Apparently Alan and Anita used to walk to a coffee shop in Palo Alto and during these walks, she used to talk about her ideas on various topics. It took only a few trips to cristalize her idea of a conference for technical women, what is known today as Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing. She was a leader in her field, not because she called herself one, but because everybody that truly knew her wanted to contribute and help make her ideas happen. Alan mentioned that although she's no longer among us, he can still "hear" her persuasive voice and vision.

Anita had an amazing talent for public speaking. Her illness affected her ability to speak, but she did not give up on talking about women and technology even when it was hard to stay coherent. She truly dedicated her life to encourage women to be fearless and involve themselves in technology.

I believe GHC is full of events that would make Anita proud: technical presentations, mentoring workshops, brainstorming on how we can encourage more women to participate in computing, and... dance. Oh, yeah, we danced! Someone saw me dancing and said something along these lines: "When I saw you talk in your session, I thought you were sooo serious. You're not that serious..." I added: "I'm very serious! I'm serious at work, serious at play too." :)

It took me three years of thinking about GHC before I actually participated in one. If you haven't started thinking about it, please do! Don't miss on the opportunity of meeting and be inspired by 2K+ women in computing. Next year, GHC is in Portland (Oregon), Nov 8-12. Save the date! (and the money to participate...) Or if you can, even better, participate in this year's GHC India.

Snippets from Grace Hopper Celebration 2010

2010-10-04T16:56:00.000-07:00

I just came back from my first Grace Hopper in Atlanta. I've had a blast! There are so many things that I would like to mention about this conference that I don't know where to start... This year's conference had 2100 participants. Yep, there is no misspelling there, you got it: 2100. I counted them myself :P

I remember the first day surrounded by so many people - (almost) all women for a BIG change - made me think of the Microsoft TechEd conferences that I attended during my undergrad. That is the last time I saw so many technical people in the same place. I couldn't stop to think about what it takes to organize such an event. My respect and admiration for the organizers has no limit!

I left the conference energized, inspired, humbled and empowered. Everybody that I talked to says the same thing about the event. I want to make it last! I decided to write - for weeks to come - about my experiences that made this GHC so special to me. My goal is to recreate some of the atmosphere there for me to remember, and for the ones that didn't attend to make them think about attending. I've been thinking about attending for 3 years now and I'm really happy that I finally made it! I would like to thank Google that sponsored my trip this year, ACM for supporting my poster presentation and to all that donated money for the GHC scholarships.

For tons of pictures from the event, check out this amazing collection.

And now... let's get started: Snippets from GHC2010 - Part 1: Anita Borg.

How Long Does A PhD Take?

2010-05-07T16:24:00.000-07:00

Every spring I usually get a flurry of questions from prospective students about how it's like to do a PhD. They vary in content, from how many courses are required to how expensive it is to live in Toronto (expensive!).

There is one question that I have a problem with: How long does it take to do a PhD? Don't take me wrong, it's a pertinent question, you embark in a long journey and you really want to know how long it will take to reach the end. I get that. The problem that I have is that this question hides a misconception about the PhD process. Or two, depending how you look at it. I've seen many students, both undergrads and early grads, that think at least one the following:

If you spend enough time enrolled as a PhD, you get a degree in the end.
You need to spend X number of years in the PhD to get a degree.

It's perfectly justified to think this way. After all, all degrees that we get before the PhD can be quantified in years. Four years of primary school, four of secondary, four of high school and five of undergrad (that's my case in numbers). And really, in my case, there was no way around it. It had to take that long (which I don't think it's a good idea, but that's a totally different conversation). But when it comes to the PhD the story changes drastically.

In my opinion, none of these ways of thinking (i.e., number 1 and 2 above) is right. The PhD doesn't take time, it takes results. And how long it takes to get results depends on many, many things. Among which: your domain, your topic, how quickly you find a topic, your enthusiasm and your grain of luck, what you want to do once you are done with the PhD, how much your work is appreciated by the research community, how much help you need and get from your supervisor. And the list could go on for a while.

I have seen students that take 2-3 years to finish and I've seen 10 years as well. Ok, 5-6 is a common number. My .2$: you should focus on the process and the results, rather than on the time. If you're in a hurry, maybe a PhD is not the right answer to your question. No matter how long it takes, it usually requires lots and lots of patience. =)

Success

2010-05-07T15:55:00.000-07:00

I discovered my definition of success during my first trip to New York some four years ago. Every time I read it, it reminds me of what I want to achieve while here...

To laugh often and much; To win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; To earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends; To appreciate beauty, to find the best in others; To leave the world a bit better, whether by a healthy child, a garden patch, or a redeemed social condition; To know even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is to have succeeded.

-- Emerson

My Ada Lovelace Post

2010-03-24T18:18:00.000-07:00

Better later than never! A short post to celebrate Ada Lovelace Day. My post today goes to cheer the women from our support group and the ladies that will be helping me with the panel of the CRA-W DLS that I'm co-organizing at UofT. What a diverse group! Although we are all studying (or teaching :) ) at Canadian universities, we are originally from Greece, China, Lebanon, Iran, Turkey, Serbia, US, Israel, Mexico and Romania. It's hard to get more diverse than this :)

I want to cheer for all of our plans: leadership positions in technical companies, project managers, professors, and - why not - PhDs! I wish you all of it to come true! And who knows, maybe before leaving UofT behind, we'll make our group "official".

Keep on being awesome!

Julia Child Is Amazing!

2010-03-08T19:15:00.000-08:00

I've been in North America only for a few years, so I didn't know about Julia Child. I learned about her like an ignorant, from the movies :P. I got fascinated with Julia's personality and Meryl Streep's interpretation of her. Not so fascinated with the price of the cook books, though... So, I was thrilled when I recently found both volumes of the Mastering the Art of French Cooking in mint condition at a used bookstore for 40% of the original price. Of course I bought them!

For the last two weekends I experimented with new recipes from the book: beef bourguignon, chicken fricassee, creme brulee, blueberry clafoutis and Livio made some delicious lady fingers. What can I say? I'm impressed! Everything is tasting soooo good, they are a bit different than what I usually cook and, with my personal shortcuts, everything was very easy to make. And fast!

What I really liked about this book is that all ingredients are in North American language and measures :). I don't have to search for one substitute or the other. That makes cooking French dishes much easier.

Now I only have to figure out how to add more exercise in my schedule to make up for the French sauces :)

In Memoriam: Irina Athanasiu

2010-03-07T15:31:00.000-08:00

I am indebted to a lot of professors that I've had throughout the years. They all encouraged me in my studies and inspired my love of learning and teaching.
One of these very special professors was Irina Athanasiu. Unfortunately, cancer took her away. I miss her. While she was still alive, I didn't dare to talk to her as much as I would have liked, even when friends from back home said that she used to mention my name quite often. I didn't want to bug her with my own issues and worries...

If I were to say only one thing about Irina was that she was the most straightforward person I've ever met. She really said it like it was, even when it wasn't pretty at all. I have a couple of emails from her from a tough period in my life and I can't help to smile when I read them. She says something like this: "what I have to say is not pretty, but here it is". I miss her advice. She had this rare skill of thinking about things from your own perspective, but with her years of experience and her very particular wisdom.

For the people that did not meet her, it's hard to describe her. And then for those that were lucky to know her, any word does not mean much compared to the experience of interacting with her. She touched the lives of an unbelievably high number of students!

It ~~was~~ is her birthday today. And I wanted to do something to remember her. She used to write a column in one of the Romanian IT magazines. I want to translate one of her articles. I read them again and again and never get bored with them. Her ideas are fresh even years and years after being published. This is my little offering for today. This way, hopefully more people will read her words. And I may repeat the experiment with other articles of hers in the future. The original can be found here in Romanian. I tried to really translate it and not adapt it such that I don't transform her words.

Shall I Be Proud?
by Irina Athanasiu

"You must be really proud to have so many former students that are now employees of Microsoft US"... someone told me recently. There are two assumptions behind this statement. First, the fact that someone works for Microsoft in US is an accomplishment in itself. Second, students' accomplishments are ascribed to their professors, and school, in general.

Why is it that if someone works for Microsoft US is a bigger accomplishment than if they work at Google in US or if they work for Microsoft Romania or Freescale, Oracle or IBM Romania? What if someone works in a company that does not have an international reputation, does it count less? Should I have considered that the ones that developed RAV during the time when the first R meant Romania and not Reliable, in other words when the product was not renowned internationally, valued less than now when they are employed by Microsoft and RAV became just a memory?

Getting hired by a company like Microsoft means passing successfully a suite of interviews that are not easy, but that are just exams, probably more difficult than the ones in school. It's about knowledge and ability testing, in other words it's about testing some premises not certifying some accomplishments. Someone that is successful during the interviews becomes one of the thousands of employees in a mechanism developed in such a way that it does not depend on the deviations of each employee from the average one (not the ideal one). The number of those that have indeed a way to influence the Microsoft products is very small, irrespective of considering technical or marketing aspects. Now I can remember only two names from the top of my head: Toma Tudor and Crisitan Petculescu.

Speaking about accomplishments, I think that George Ciprian Necula getting the Grace Murray Hopper award for the best young researcher of the year in 2001 (http://awards.acm.org/hopper/) and Ion Stoica obtaining the ACM prize for the best PhD thesis in CS (http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1014887) are reasons to be proud for these two. I also think that my former student Daniel Bogdan, one of the two founders fo IPDevel (www.ipdevel.ro) have reasons to be proud, given the spectacular evolution of the company started in 2000 when Daniel was still a student.

How much of students' accomplishments are due to their professors is a question that I will answer with my favorite answer: it really depends. Recently, one of the graduates, Vivi, wrote me an email to let me know that he passed successfully all interviews and he will start working for Google USA starting this fall. In the same email, he reminded me that he worked during his undergrad studies and he didn't finish the most difficult major in our department. In other words, he was successful for what he wanted while not following the advice that I always give to the students. Does that mean that Vivi succeeded without the school's help? For me, the fact that Vivi felt the need to write back to me means that he heard and he wondered if I were right or not. I would be proud if all students that I talk to would listen to what I have to say and think whether I'm right or wrong. If then they act according to their own conclusions, it would mean that at least part of my job description was covered.

What part of the multiple successes obtained by our Computer Science and Engineering Department team of students (http://icpc.baylor.edu/past/icpc2005/finals/Standings.html) in international competitions are ascribed to the school? What if these students were studying at a different university in Romania or abroad, do you think they wouldn't have obtained the same prizes? Probably the merit of the school is that because it's renowned, it attracts a lot of very good students that you can build winning teams with. Also, the group of professors and TAs that manage every year to select and advise a group of students is a contribution of the school. Does this mean anything about the whole school in general?

To be proud of someone else's success, you must have done something to contribute to this success. Otherwise, of course we've always been and ar proud of Nadia Comaneci's* successes.

* Nadia Comaneci is a famous Romanian gymnast that got the first full 10 in the Olympics Games for gymnastic.

Hiring 101: We Want YOU!

2010-02-15T19:41:00.000-08:00

I'm cheering for a dear friend that is embarking on her - I'm sure - very successful technical career. While talking about her interviewing experience, I couldn't stop thinking how important the way your prospective employer treats you really is! When all is equal (and for jobs at famous companies that happens often), how "wanted" you feel when offered the job becomes very important.

When trying to hire your brightest prospective employee, don't count on your hip work place with great benefits and prime-color cubes. Don't forget to tell your candidate how much you want them for the job!

Much better said from the connoisseur: Wanted!

The Importance of Internships

2010-02-08T10:26:00.000-08:00

My path in grad school was definitely not a straight one. I've had quite some adventures that I now think of as fortunate events (they didn't really feel that way when they happened :) ). All in all, I didn't have time to do more than one internship and that happened late in my PhD (I went last year for a long internship with Intel @ Santa Clara).

I received today an email about an internship that I would have really-really liked to apply for. You know how it is: the perfect internship at the impossible time. I'm very tempted, but I was reminded that I should focus on my list of priorities and that means finishing the work for my PhD thesis this month.

Oh, well, what else can I do than write a post about why I think internships are important and why you should do a couple with different companies.

Like everything in life, there are pros and there are cons. I'll start with the pros.

Few of the pros:

New Environment: I can't stress enough the importance of getting exposed to new environments as early as possible in your PhD. New environments means new people, new ideas, renewed excitement, learning, networking and - why not? - new friendships.
Company Culture: I didn't understand this one until I got to experience -first-hand - the culture of a company. One extremely important requirement for you to enjoy your job and be successful at it is to be in line with the company value system. Allow me a joke: it's like marriage: doomed to fail unless there is a serious overlap in the value system of the two. Same thing with working for a company. You don't appreciate what they're after, you won't find motivation to put in the work, you won't have fun, and you won't succeed at your job. There is no other way you can understand and learn the culture of the company than working there. You get to see what gets rewarded, what they are shooting for and how they do it. In other words, you learn the definition of success and the means to obtain it. And needless to say, companies are not all the same, hence you should plan for at least two internships in different companies.
Publications: If you plan your internship carefully and with the adequate amount of luck, you can get out of there with a publication or the idea for a publication. If that doesn't happen, you gain some experience on doing research on something else than your thesis.
Fun: Let's admit it, all companies have great locations for their internships and they also pay you quite well. So... you are in a new place with resources (read money) for traveling. What are you waiting for?

Some cons:

Time: If you're not so lucky (I wasn't...), you may end up working on something unrelated to your thesis that - most likely - you won't even be allowed to talk about externally. All this means that you may feel at times that your time was wasted. I have to admit, I was tempted to feel that I wasted precious time during my internship. It's true that I would have finished my PhD earlier (in this economy, I'm not so sure it would have been a good idea :P), but the experience and the confidence that I've gained in my internship wouldn't have happened otherwise. I got to play with cutting edge tools in my research domain that I have no access to otherwise. I got to see what "real" industry is interested in and how they approach their ideas. I got to see what type of work gets appreciated. I understood the different career paths that you can have inside that company. And I understood what it means and what it takes to be working for Intel.
Supervisors: Reality is not all supervisors are supportive of their students' internships. This is a delicate matter, but I'm sure there are ways to deal with it. Ultimately, your supervisor should be interested in your professional development and you can clearly make a case that an internship would add value to your portfolio.
Loss of Momentum: This is one I'm still dealing with... It takes time to swing back into your schedule and research rhythm. It takes time until you ramp up again and feel productive back in school. Again, this depends on your particular situation, and I argue this con is worth dealing with.

My .02$ on the matter: try to do a couple of internships early in your PhD. Enjoy the benefits, work around the cons and take advantage of the opportunity of meeting and analyzing your future employer up close and personal. One tip that not everyone is willing to share is this: go for a short internship (3.5 months). If interest is on both sides, internships can be extended so easily. Good luck and have fun!

Update: You never know when you receive an email from your internship manager asking you if you're interested in a full time position before the announcement about the available position goes public...

Life Is Worth Losing...

2010-02-07T18:00:00.000-08:00

... That's the title of a George Carlin show that I enjoyed watching on New Year's Day. And it is a perfect way to start a new year! I discovered George Carlin recently when I very dear friend replied to my satirical description of the "stuff" we brought back from California with the "too much stuff" clip from George Carlin.

This stand-up comedian is impressive! I rarely find stand-up comedy entertaining (ok, maybe I haven't seen enough...), but I really enjoy George Carlin. And it's easy to explain: not only that he makes me laugh out loud, he makes me think. And that's the type of entertainment I like the most: the one that entertains and teaches you something at the same time.

I watched some of the early George Carlin clips, and, as himself explains in some interview I watched, they are not the same style as his later ones. They are still funny, but not as insightful. The last two HBO shows I've seen from him (Life is Worth Losing and It's Bad For Ya') are highly recommended.

When I got back from Google CS GRAD Forum* I treated myself buying "Last Words", George Carlin's memoir. That's on my (long) to read list.

Here it is a teaser for you. If this doesn't make you try to watch some more George Carlin, then he's not your type: The Modern Man.

* Many thanks go to Gail for telling me about the forum and for encouraging me to apply. Without her notice and support, I would have not applied and missed on this great opportunity!

New Style Blogroll

2009-11-09T19:05:00.000-08:00

Instead of a blog roll, I decided to share blog posts that I find interesting. I created a section on my blog called "Ioana shares..." that contains items shared in my reader with a quick note. You can access the full stories by clicking on the "View all" link. You may need to scroll for a while to get to it. Enjoy!

Supervision Philosophy

2009-11-03T20:17:00.000-08:00

Student supervision is an important component of the academic job. I believe there is a correlation between the success of the research (individual and as a group) and the supervision style. How about having a supervision philosophy/statement as part of the "job package", along with the research and teaching statements?

Update: Departments usually ask only for research and teaching statements. Maybe this will change with time. For example, I noticed that the ECE Department @ Cornell added this to their job announcement:

Personal statements summarizing teaching experience and interests, leadership efforts and contributions to diversity are encouraged.

On a different note, there are professors that have their supervising philosophy linked on their web page. You can find one example here . Talking to students around, I understand that they like as much transparency as possible. Stating upfront your take on supervising (more than hands-on/hands-off) can help students make better decisions when shopping around for supervisors. Mutually advantageous, IMHO.

Life Lessons in Bullet Form

2009-11-01T20:36:00.000-08:00

I recently attended a "President Panel" event organized by the IEEE Toronto Women in Engineering and IEEE Toronto Student Branch at UofT. Two of the invited speakers were Janet Holder, president of Enbridge Gas Distribution and Shannon O'Connor, IBM Canada Business Partners. The two hours were packed with life lessons, funny stories, and insightful conversations.

There were a couple of points that stuck with me and I'll paste them here in bullet form:

Four essential career lessons:

Define happiness - what kind of career makes you happy
Be true to yourself - decisions will be easier to make when you know your value system/your list of priorities
Work smarter - no need to work 12 hours a day if you learn how to work smarter
Build your network - advance faster in your career with your network support

Be responsible for your own skill development. Apparently, IBM has a name for the new type of skills that technical people need: the "T-shaped" skills. Just like the T letter, you need both technical depth and broad business skills (e.g., communication, negotiation, presentation).
Focus on the outcome and think backwards on how to get there.
Anything worth doing is worth doing well.

To whom much is given, much is expected.

Your boss is your mentor. She/He probably knows better both your weaknesses and your strengths.
Your values should be aligned with your company's values. Otherwise, move! Don't put yourself in a position where you're stuck!

When building your team, look for sharing values, but also complementary set of skills.
Mentors with same background/values can help you pull it through and advance in your career faster. But mentors with different views on the matter can help you see things from a different perspective. Have both kinds!
Understand what the metric for success is and deliver! You'll be asked to do 30 little things along the way, nobody will remember you for the little things. The metric for success is essential, so prioritize for optimizing that.
Innovation and creativity doesn't need to be big. Even smaller things can make a difference.
Ideas in itself are not worth a lot. Ideas with implementation and realization... now that's something!

Mansbridge One on One: Cancer Research at University of Toronto

2009-10-04T18:37:00.000-07:00

Back to Toronto after a long internship in US, I'm re-discovering the few Canadian shows I like watching on TV. Mansbridge One on One runs on Saturday nights for half an hour. The show features interviews with renowned personalities from all walks of life. Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Bill Gates were among the guests on the show.

Last night's show was quite surprising. The guest was Dr. Shana Kelley, professor at University of Toronto. A multidisciplinary research group lead by Dr. Kelley developed a microchip that can scan molecules and determine the type and the severity of cancer. The prototype was already tested on several types of cancer. Dr. Kelley anticipates a five year period until the device can be used in clinics for early cancer detection. You can read more about this on the UofT news website.

Dr. Kelley moved to UofT from US in 2006 and was surprised to see that obtaining funding for this project was easier in Canada than in US. Since she got to Toronto, the project took off with support from different governmental agencies. On the other hand, she mentioned that getting funding for basic/initial research steps is not as easy. She emphasized that lack of funding for fundamental research precludes breakthroughs later on. This funding issue is a chicken-and-egg problem: you can't get funding if you don't have a promising project going on, but it's hard to get (any) research going without funding.

As a fun note, Dr. Kelley moved to Canada as a result of a two-body problem :)

Update: You can find the recording of this show online here.

The Chronicle - First Time on the Market

2009-09-04T11:29:00.000-07:00

The Chronicle (on Higher Education) has a special collection of articles dedicated to those who enter the academic market for the first time. I think it's a good starting point for preparing for the job hunt. You can find the collection here.

Equal vs. Fair and Quantity vs. Quality

2009-09-02T18:01:00.000-07:00

MacLean recently had a three-part article about higher-education in Canada. Apparently, the presidents of five "big" universities in Canada started a discussion about what can be done to improve higher education in Canada.

It seems that this big five group (let's call it G5) proposes a differentiation among Canadian universities: some (namely G5) should focus on research and grad studies, and the rest should dedicate their existence to producing the best undergrads possible. Obviously, the smaller universities showed their disapproval.

Well, the initiative to discuss the future of Canadian education is more than welcome, but I have to admit that some surprising points were (not) raised. I will try to refer to few of them.

-------------------------------------

Equal vs. Fair - I'm not sure an imposed differentiation is a viable solution. The fact that it works for others (see US) does not imply by any means that it would work for Canada. I've seen "imported" ideas fail in my native country. Usually, if you want a borrowed idea to work, the backgrounds have to be similar, which is rarely the case. It's better if you address the real problem and propose solutions targeted at the existing situation, not to someone else's situation.

This "differentiation" suggestion may come as a result of the "equal" way in which some funding is distributed across Canadian universities. I'm not 100% sure, but I think there are some "quotas", such that everyone gets a chance. This can result in a mediocre idea from university X getting funding instead of a good idea from university Y, just because university Y has too many great ideas, while there is less competition at university X. What about "fair" spread of resources as opposed to "equal". Ideas should be rewarded based on their merit, not based on where they originate. If an idea from not-so-big university X is great, then fund it. If it is not, then don't fund it. While "quotas" is much easier to deal with than "merit", I think it's well worth the effort.

Quantity vs. Quality - Here it is an excerpt from one of the articles

"[...] UBC’s Toope said, universities need to graduate more students with higher degrees. “Both at the level of a master’s but even more importantly at the level of Ph.D.s, we are not producing at the level of our American colleagues, and actually many others in the OECD,” he said. “I suspect that’s an indicator of a relative lack of overall performance at the highest levels.” [...]"

Since when quantity = quality?! I would have liked a discussion about how competitive these PhD students are, and what Canada does to create jobs for the many PhDs it produces. What about the "retention" of PhDs in Canada? I have a hunch that quite a percentage migrates to US looking for jobs after obtaining their PhDs. Let's talk about my domain: I'm not aware of any research lab in Canada where my specialization in computer architecture would be sought after. I wonder if there is any research lab that can attract computer science/computer engineering PhDs. I'm not aware of any. Not to add that, for example, the Computer Science department at UBC hasn't hired in the last... hmmm... is it 3 or 5 years? (I don't have actual stats, I tried to guess-timate this by looking at the UBC CS professors webpages - page by page).

Research, Research, Research - The G5 did raise the problem of transferring the research from academia to the marketplace. That's good! But, is there anything that Canada can do to create/improve/encourage research in industry, not only in academia? Instead of using PhD grads for jobs for which - let's be honest - a Master is enough, can we do anything to create environments that challenge the PhD grads and maximize their potential? Otherwise, no offense, but we're wasting money keeping them in school if we don't end up using their skills... or, even worse, export them to US.

Canada - Second Tier? - Last, but not least:

"[...] The penalty for drift, Naylor said, is that Canada could be perceived as a second-tier destination for foreign academics and international students. [...]"

Spot on! My opinion is that Canada is perceived as a second tier already... So what can be done to change this?

--------------------------

To end in an optimistic tone, it is good this discussion started. The first step toward a solution is to be aware of the problem. I hope this initiative will lead to some interesting debate and some appropriate solutions will emerge.

PS: Thanks to Gail that blogged about this. That's how I first heard about the G5 proposal.

The First One

2009-08-26T16:36:00.001-07:00

Today is the day! I've gather enough courage to write my first post.

I would like this blog to be about anything related to academia. I'm currently a PhD student and I seriously intend to follow an academic career. Seth Godin has an interesting classification for blogs in his e-book "Who's There?": cat blogs, boss blogs, and viral blogs. I know I don't want to have a cat, nor a boss blog. Getting viral sounds unrealistic. So, for now, I'll post the reasons why I would like to blog and we'll see how it goes.

I don't enjoy writing. I need the practice since writing represents a high percentage of the time you spend in an academic job. So, let's start with something more free-form than scientific writing.
There are so few women in academia, specially in my domain (computer science and engineering/computer architecture). It would be great if we could connect online more than we do.
Since I got to North America, I'm losing courage to voice my opinions. I'm not sure what exactly causes this, but I need to get rid of it.

I will be blogging with my real name for several reasons. First, I don't appreciate how the blogosphere sometimes transforms in a rant and rave place where you can say whatever because you don't really have to take responsibility for it. Second, there is a greater sense of connection when you know who you're talking to. I also believe we need to encourage female presence in academia by the power of the example, while assuming responsibility for it.

As the title suggests, I'd like this place to be a brainstorming place, not a collection of set-in-stone ideas. I appreciate reflection and flexibility.

Someone famous said something about doing one thing that scares you every day. Here it is for today: I'm starting a blog!